Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F. & Uzzi, B. The rising dominance of groups in manufacturing of information. Science 316, 1036–1039 (2007).
Paul-Hus, A., Mongeon, P., Sainte-Marie, M. & Larivière, V. The sum of all of it: Revealing collaboration patterns by combining authorship and acknowledgements. J. Informer. 11, 80–87 (2017).
Fortunato, S. et al. Science of science. Science 359, eaao0185 (2018).
Allen, L., O’Connell, A. & Kiermer, V. How can we guarantee visibility and variety in analysis contributions? how the contributor position taxonomy (CRediT) helps the shift from authorship to contributorship. Be taught. Publ. 32, 71–74 (2019).
Desrochers, N., Paul-Hus, A. & Larivière, V. The angle sum principle: Exploring the literature on acknowledgments in scholarly communication. In Sugimoto, C. R. (ed.) Theories of Informetrics and Scholarly Communication, 225–247, (De Gruyter Saur, 2016).
Paul-Hus, A. & Desrochers, N. Acknowledgements will not be simply thanks notes: A qualitative evaluation of acknowledgements content material in scientific articles and opinions printed in 2015. PLOS ONE 14, e0226727 (2019).
Cronin, B., Shaw, D. & La Barre, Ok. Seen, much less seen, and invisible work: Patterns of collaboration in twentieth century chemistry. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 55, 160–168 (2004).
Cronin, B., Shaw, D. & La Barre, Ok. A solid of hundreds: Coauthorship and subauthorship collaboration within the twentieth century as manifested within the scholarly journal literature of psychology and philosophy. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 54, 855–871 (2003).
Cronin, B. & Overfelt, Ok. The scholar’s courtesy: A survey of acknowledgement behaviour. J. Doc. 50, 165–196 (1994).
Laudel, G. What can we measure by co-authorships? Res. Eval. 11, 3–15 (2002).
Councill, I. G., Giles, C. L., Han, H. & Manavoglu, E. Automated acknowledgement indexing: Increasing the semantics of contribution within the CiteSeer digital library. In Proc. third Int. Conf. Knowl. Seize, Ok-CAP’05 19–26, (2005).
Kobayashi, T., Ogisu, Y. & Onaga, T. Unstable diffusion in social networks. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.14560 (2021).
Paul-Hus, A., Desrochers, N. & Costas, R. Characterization, description, and issues for the usage of funding acknowledgement knowledge in internet of science. Scientometrics 108, 167–182 (2016).
Daz-Faes Adrian, A. & Bordons, M. Making seen the invisible by the evaluation of acknowledgements within the humanities. Aslib J. Inf. Manag. 69, 576–590 (2017).
Rigby, J. Systematic grant and funding physique acknowledgement knowledge for publications: New dimensions and new controversies for analysis coverage and analysis. Res. Eval. 20, 365–375 (2011).
Wang, J. & Shapira, P. Funding acknowledgement evaluation: an enhanced software to analyze analysis sponsorship impacts: the case of nanotechnology. Scientometrics 87, 563–586 (2011).
Gök, A., Rigby, J. & Shapira, P. The influence of analysis funding on scientific outputs: Proof from six smaller European international locations. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 67, 715–730 (2016).
Mejia, C. & Kajikawa, Y. Utilizing acknowledgement knowledge to characterize funding organizations by the kinds of analysis sponsored: The case of robotics analysis. Scientometrics 114, 883–904 (2018).
Tian, S., Xu, X. & Li, P. Acknowledgement community and quotation depend: the moderating position of collaboration community. Scientometrics 126, 7837–7857 (2021).
Costas, R. & van Leeuwen, T. N. Approaching the “reward triangle”: Normal evaluation of the presence of funding acknowledgments and “peer interactive communication” in scientific publications. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 63, 1647–1661 (2012).
Daz-Faes, A. A. & Bordons, M. Acknowledgments in scientific publications: Presence in Spanish science and textual content patterns throughout disciplines. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 65, 1834–1849 (2014).
Giles, C. L. & Councill, I. G. Who will get acknowledged: Measuring scientific contributions by automated acknowledgment indexing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 17599–17604 (2004).
Khabsa, M., Treeratpituk, P. & Giles, C. L. Ackseer: a repository and search engine for robotically extracted acknowledgments from digital libraries. In Proc. twelfth ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conf. on Digital Libraries, 185–194 (2012).
Khabsa, M., Koppman, S. & Giles, C. L. In the direction of constructing and analyzing a social community of acknowledgments in scientific and tutorial paperwork. In Int. Conf. on Social Computing, Behavioral-Cultural Modeling, and Prediction, 357–364 (Springer, 2012).
McCain, Ok. W. Past Garfield’s quotation index: an evaluation of some points in constructing a private title acknowledgments index. Scientometrics 114, 605–631 (2018).
Zeng, A. et al. The science of science: From the angle of advanced methods. Phys. Rep. 714–715, 1–73 (2017).
Newman, M. E. Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 5200–5205 (2004).
PLOS Collection Knowledge https://plos.org/sitemap.xml Accessed: 2021-11-01.
Scientific Studies Knowledge https://www.nature.com/sitemap.xml Accessed: 2021-02-12.
Larivière, V. et al. Contributorship and division of labor in data manufacturing. Soc. Stud. Sci. 46, 417–435 (2016).
Manning, C. D. et al. The Stanford CoreNLP pure language processing toolkit. In Proc. 52nd Annu. Meet. Affiliation for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations, 55–60 (2014).
An, J., Jeon, S., Jones, T. & Track, M. Knowledge-driven sample evaluation of acknowledgments within the biomedical area. Knowledge and Data Administration 1, 35–48 (2017).
Subsequent steps for Microsoft tutorial – increasing into new horizons. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/project/academic/articles/microsoft-academic-to-expand-horizons-with-community-driven-approach/. Accessed: 2022-02-01.
Microsoft tutorial graph is being discontinued. what’s subsequent? https://www.natureindex.com/news-blog/microsoft-academic-graph-discontinued-whats-next. Accessed: 2022-02-01.
How microsoft tutorial makes use of data to handle the issue of conflation/disambiguation. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/project/academic/articles/microsoft-academic-uses-knowledge-address-problem-conflation-disambiguation/. Accessed: 2022-02-01.
Li, J., Yin, Y., Fortunato, S. & Wang, D. A dataset of publication information for Nobel laureates. Sci. Knowledge. 6, 1–10 (2019).
Rennie, D., Yank, V. & Emanuel, L. When authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountable. JAMA 278, 579–585 (1997).
Ding, Y. Scientific collaboration and endorsement: Community evaluation of coauthorship and quotation networks. J. Informer. 5, 187–203 (2011).
Pan, R. Ok., Kaski, Ok. & Fortunato, S. World quotation and collaboration networks: Uncovering the position of geography in science. Sci. Rep. 2, 1–7 (2012).
Frenken, Ok., Hardeman, S. & Hoekman, J. Spatial scientometrics: In the direction of a cumulative analysis program. J. Informer. 3, 222–232 (2009).
Sano, Y. & Kusumegi, Ok. Acknowledged students extracted from open entry journals, zenodo, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6592098 (2022).
Israel, G. D. Figuring out pattern dimension. (1992).
Alstott, J., Bullmore, E. & Plenz, D. powerlaw: a python bundle for evaluation of heavy-tailed distributions. PLOS ONE 9, e85777 (2014).
Saramäki, J., Kivelä, M., Onnela, J.-P., Kaski, Ok. & Kertesz, J. Generalizations of the clustering coefficient to weighted advanced networks. Phys. Rev. E 75, 027105 (2007).
Baccini, A. & Petrovich, E. Normative versus strategic accounts of acknowledgment knowledge: The case of the top-five journals of economics. Scientometrics 127, 603–635 (2022).
Avenue, J. M., Rogers, W. A., Israel, M. & Braunack-Mayer, A. J. Credit score the place credit score is due? regulation, analysis integrity and the attribution of authorship within the well being sciences. Soc. Sci. Med. 70, 1458–1465 (2010).
Vasilevsky, N. A. et al. Is authorship ample for at present’s collaborative analysis? a name for contributor roles. Account. Res. 28, 23–43 (2021).
Holcombe, A. O. Contributorship, not authorship: Use credit score to point who did what. Publications 7, 48 (2019).
McNutt, M. Ok. et al. Transparency in authors’ contributions and tasks to advertise integrity in scientific publication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115, 2557–2560 (2018).
Haak, L., Greene, S. & Ratan, Ok. A brand new analysis financial system: Socio-technical framework to open up traces of credit score within the tutorial group. Res. Concepts Outcomes 6, e60477 (2020).
Ferreira, A. A., Gonçalves, M. A. & Laender, A. H. A short survey of automated strategies for creator title disambiguation. SIGMOD Rec. 41, 15–26 (2012).
Färber, M. & Ao, L. The microsoft tutorial data graph enhanced: Writer title disambiguation, publication classification, and embeddings. Quant. Sci. Stud. 3, 51–98 (2022).
Kusumegi, Ok. Supply code for: Dataset of recognized students talked about in acknowledgement assertion, zenodo, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6855293 (2022).