ai express – Utah Governor Spencer Cox has recently signed two highly controversial bills into law. These bills have stirred up quite a bit of debate and have significant implications for the state’s education system and transgender individuals. One of the bills effectively puts an end to diversity, equity, and inclusion programs in state-owned schools. The other bill prohibits transgender individuals from using restrooms that do not align with their biological sex, with only a few exceptions in state-owned buildings. These new laws have sparked widespread discussions and raised concerns about equality and inclusivity in Utah.
According to Cox, the recently signed HB257 aims to enhance privacy protections and ensure the safety and comfort of all individuals in public facilities.
The bill mandates the creation of additional unisex and single-stall facilities in public buildings. It also stipulates that transgender individuals can only utilize gender-specific bathrooms if they have undergone transgender-related surgery and have updated their birth certificates to reflect their gender identity.
Transgender bathroom bill
The Legislature passed the bill on Friday following discussions between representatives and senators to address areas of disagreement. In a brief meeting, six lawmakers approved the fifth substitute version of HB257. Representative Kera Birkeland, R-Morgan, the bill sponsor, emphasized that the revised version makes it “crystal clear” that students cannot be penalized for using a restroom that does not match their assigned sex at birth.
“We never intended for any child to receive a criminal record simply for using a restroom,” Birkeland expressed.
The bill only applies to buildings owned by the government, not private businesses. The passed version of the bill includes a provision that protects government entities from lawsuits that may arise from enforcing the law. In such cases, the state would cover the court costs.
Cox expressed his support for the bill, although he did not explicitly commit to signing it. Before the session, he emphasized the importance of preserving “women’s spaces” while also ensuring that LGBTQ individuals are treated with dignity.
The bill has been criticized by the caucus as “discriminatory” and “a step backward in our ongoing fight for equality and acceptance of all.” Additionally, concerns have been raised regarding the bill’s constitutionality and the potential legal challenges it may face, which the caucus considers to be an irresponsible use of state funding.
Read more: Yellow Mama: Seventy-five Years of Alabama Capital Punishment
Diversity, equity and inclusion bill
Supporters of HB261, which aims to modify state-sponsored diversity, equity, and inclusion programs, argue that their goal is to provide equal opportunities for everyone in need, irrespective of factors such as race.
HB261 seeks to broaden the scope of diversity initiatives by extending them to all students, including those who are not typically prioritized, such as Black students and individuals from marginalized communities. Additionally, the bill aims to prevent universities and other public entities from mandating “diversity statements” as part of the job application process. Furthermore, it strives to promote “academic freedom” within college campuses. This legislation would be applicable to K-12 schools and other publicly funded institutions.
“There is still much work to be accomplished. It is our collective responsibility, as individuals and members of our communities, to approach one another with compassion and extend a helping hand to those in need,” emphasized Rep. Katy Hall, R-South Ogden, during a recent hearing on the bill. She further added, “Let us uplift those who require assistance, regardless of their circumstances.”
Supporters of the bill argue that it will create a fair and equal opportunity for all university students by providing them with necessary aid and encouragement. However, opponents express concern that students from marginalized communities, including people of color, who have historically benefited from programs promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion, might face disadvantages as a result.
“We have expressed concerns about certain programs and policies related to diversity, equity, and inclusion, particularly in terms of hiring practices. However, this bill presents a well-balanced solution. I appreciate the Legislature for not following the approach taken by other states, which involved completely eliminating funding for diversity, equity, and inclusion without providing an alternative path for students who may require support. Instead, this funding will be redirected to assist all students in Utah, ensuring their success regardless of their background,” stated Cox in his statement on Tuesday evening.
According to him, Utah’s strength lies in its diversity, and he firmly believes in creating an environment where everyone can flourish.
“Our administration has been actively collaborating with various community stakeholders to create more opportunities for all Utahns over the past three years, and we remain committed to this objective,” he stated.
In their statement, Senate Democrats expressed their strong disapproval of the passage of HB261, stating that it undermines the progress made towards creating a more inclusive society.
The caucus emphasized the importance of diversity, equity, and inclusion programs in fostering knowledge, understanding, empathy, and respect among our diverse population. They expressed concern that limiting the implementation of these programs would undermine the progress made in building a more inclusive society.
