Governor Holcomb urged to reject wetlands bill

Indiana Governor Holcomb Urged to Veto Controversial Wetlands Bill

Environmental activists and concerned citizens are calling on Indiana Governor Holcomb to veto a highly controversial wetlands bill. The bill, recently passed by the state legislature, has sparked heated debates and concerns among environmentalists who argue that it could have detrimental effects on the state’s wetlands.

The proposed legislation, known as Senate Bill 389, seeks to redefine the definition of wetlands and remove certain protections for these important ecosystems. If signed into law, the bill would significantly weaken regulations surrounding wetlands, potentially leading to increased development and destruction of these vital habitats.

Opponents of the bill argue that wetlands play a crucial role in water filtration, flood control, and providing habitat for a diverse range of plant and animal species. They fear that relaxing regulations on wetlands could have severe consequences for Indiana’s environment and wildlife.

Governor Holcomb’s decision on whether to veto the bill is eagerly awaited by both supporters and opponents. Environmental groups have been actively campaigning against the bill, urging the governor to consider the long-term implications and potential harm that could be caused by its passage.


It remains to be seen how Governor Holcomb will respond to the overwhelming pressure from environmentalists and citizens concerned about the future of Indiana’s wetlands. As the controversy continues to unfold, all eyes are on the governor’s office, awaiting his decision on this contentious issue.

Asher Bookspan, a reporter for WSBT 22, takes us through the story.

Two geese can be seen drinking water at the Elkhart wetlands, which play a crucial role in water filtration and flood control.

Indiana (WSBT) recently reported that there was a significant increase in the number of car accidents in the state. The state police analyzed the data and found that distracted driving was a major contributing factor in these accidents. The use of cell phones while driving has become a serious problem, with many drivers being tempted to check their phones or send text messages while behind the wheel. This dangerous behavior not only puts the driver at risk but also endangers the lives of other road users. The state police have launched a campaign to raise awareness about the dangers of distracted driving and to encourage drivers to put their phones away while driving.

Environmentalists are urging Governor Eric Holcomb of Indiana not to sign a bill that would reduce protections for wetlands in the state. They argue that wetlands play a vital role in maintaining water quality, providing habitat for wildlife, and mitigating the impacts of floods. By reducing protections, it could lead to the loss of these important ecosystems and harm both the environment and the communities that depend on them.

Brian Vigue, the Audubon Great Lakes freshwater policy director, expressed his concern about the exclusion of a certain group of wetlands and the potential consequences of moving them from the highest level of protection to a less protected status. Vigue emphasized that there doesn’t seem to be any scientific or conservation justification for this decision, as it could expose these wetlands to being filled.

Vigue expresses several concerns regarding House Bill 1383, with one major worry being the potential loss of a natural water filtration system. This would have a significant impact on the general public and their finances.

According to Vigue, individuals with private wells will have to bear the cost of compensating for the filtration deficiency caused by the loss of wetlands. Similarly, those reliant on municipal or public well systems will also have to pay more as someone needs to fill the void left by the valuable functions performed by wetlands.

According to Vigue, he strongly believes that the bill disregards wetland protection in favor of development.

Vigue expressed his belief that there is a possibility for smart development that utilizes the benefits provided by wetlands. However, he disagrees with the approach taken in this particular bill, suggesting that it seems rushed and focused on bypassing wetland protection processes for the sake of development. Vigue advocates for taking the time to find a comprehensive solution that satisfies all parties involved.

Read More:


Articles: 2833

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *